Demonstration sparks campus controversy
September 16, 2019
An abortion demonstration that appeared on campus Monday morning displayed several billboards covered in pictures of apparently aborted fetuses in front of Bryan Hall. The group, known as The Center for Bio-ethical Reform, held the demonstration that attracted many passersby and counterprotesters.
The demonstration also included historic photos from lynchings and the Holocaust, comparing them to abortions.
The Daily Evergreen reached out to The Jewish Community of the Palouse for comment, however the JCP board chose not to respond at this time.
Other photos showed images of seemingly aborted fetuses. A poster next to the billboards stated the photos were authentic and undoctored, with text stating:
“To confirm their authenticity, please ask to see our copy of ‘The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology.’”
The photos on the posters, however, were not from the textbook but the group’s own website, abortionno.org. [Warning, this website includes graphic images]. The photos on the website are not attributed.
“It doesn’t say that they’re from the textbook, it just says to confirm the authenticity of the photos, see this textbook,” said Kevin Olivier, director of operations for CBR.
The textbook, Olivier said, confirmed the authenticity of the group’s photos because it showed a similar morphology based on the developmental stage.
“The thing that people are often skeptical about is that the babies look as developed as they look at the early ages that we put on our photos,” he said.
One of the billboards used a partial quote from the textbook:
“Human development begins at fertilization,” but left out the second part of the sentence, “approximately 14 days after the onset of the last normal menstrual period.”
ASWSU At-Large Senator Linda Vargas said the group is legally allowed to demonstrate as WSU is a public university. The group sent a letter to WSU President Kirk Schulz saying they have legal teams who will protect them if WSU chooses not to let them have the demonstration, she said.
The posters were more graphic than Vargas expected, she said, and she was worried it could be triggering for some people, she said.
Vargas said the Bias Advisory Response Team placed posters around the demonstration to let people know what it would entail.
“I feel like those signs are not enough to prepare you for what you’re gonna see,” Vargas said.
Students are encouraged to talk to ASWSU senators in terms of how to handle demonstrations like this in the future, she said.
“The photos are graphic because abortion is graphic,” Olivier said. “The photos are nothing more than babies immediately after abortion procedures.”
Olivier said their goal is to show people that abortions are an “act of violence,” and that there is another planned demonstration Tuesday.
Olivia O’Brien, junior fine arts major, said she understands the university’s policy about free speech, but was “appalled” and “disgusted” when she saw the demonstration on her way to class.
“[WSU] is for students,” O’Brien said. “This is a place where we’re supposed to feel safe, this is our home, this does not make me feel safe.”
She said there were pro-life demonstrations in the past and this was the first time she saw a big display for it.
“For [WSU] to have all this talk of respecting and honoring their student body and loving the students of Wazzu and the community — this is not creating a community, this is creating a divide,” O’Brien said.
Amy Nusbaum, a doctoral candidate in the department of psychology, sat near the demonstration with a sign that read; “We Won’t Go Back #protectroe,” next to that statement was a depiction of a wire coat hanger. She said she had been there since 8 a.m.
“The rights of people with uteruses should not be thrown away because of someone’s religion,” Nusbaum said.
Cristal Sianez-Celis, junior nursing major, said the group does not consider women who are facing the option to abort. Men without uteruses should not force their opinion on the women directly affected by abortion laws, she said.
“I don’t understand why they’re trying to make people feel bad for having a choice,” Sianez-Celis said.
Members from a local band, Street Couch, played the tambourine, guitar and percussion next to the demonstration while holding a sign that read “Fight hate w/ music.”
“They have $2,000 worth of aluminum and we got a pizza box, but our side is louder,” one of the band members said as the crowd cheered.
Kyle Harding, Street Couch vocalist and frontman, said the band wanted to spread a positive message through music. The demonstration is a fear tactic that brings out the worst in people, he said.
“Imagine if someone was going through a difficult decision to do something like this right now and they saw this — that could push them to possibly even worse things,” Harding said.
D. Rose • Sep 27, 2019 at 12:27 pm
@Colfax Jones – Yes, I would (and do) say the same thing about drone strikes, our global military misadventures, and our so-called allies in Saudi Arabia.
As for “the organism isn’t capable of sustaining life at conception,” I never said or implied otherwise. I think you’re trying to obscure the real point.
We all know that an embryo or fetus can’t survive outside the womb for much of its development; but the pro-choice side prefers to ignore the fact that unless something kills it, that embryo *will* become a living, breathing human being. Put those two facts together and it’s clear that abortion is not merely a question of personal choice and not solely about women’s rights — it’s a question of when and why we allow each other to end human lives.
Regarding this article, I’m not saying you’re all complaining simply because it was a conservative demonstration. It is a controversial subject, and you’re free to disagree. I’m saying that the media has a long-standing pattern of covering progressive causes very differently from conservative ones.
If you look with an open mind at the way the stories are presented and the words that are used to describe these events, you’ll see it. A progressive group is always rallying for justice or change or awareness; a conservative group is always divisive, controversial, alarming.
I defy you to find a news article in *any* mainstream (i.e., not specifically conservative) news source that contradicts this pattern. If I’m wrong, it should be easy.
I don’t think most journalists even realize they’re doing it, because it’s normal in their milieu. But once you start seeing it, it’s like getting new glasses; you don’t become aware of how much you weren’t seeing until you put the new pair on.
Colfax Jones • Sep 23, 2019 at 11:10 am
D. Rose – “It’s past time we all admitted that we’re talking about ending human lives here.” – I assume you say the same whenever a drone strike kills farmers in Afghanistan in “the name of national security,” or we’re sending troops to Saudi Arabia even though they funded 9/11 and killed a US citizen in the last year in their embassy.
Your argument of “you’re all complaining because it’s a conservative stance” has nothing to do with the issue and only serves to grandstand and drive a wedge, completely unrelated, in the argument.
Scientifically speaking the organism isn’t capable of sustaining life at conception, that is just incorrect.
The “argument” that you call out in your post derails immediately into a tirade against a progressive media, making no points and citing no facts about the argument actually happening.
Pro Life Individual • Sep 22, 2019 at 5:36 pm
For those of you who have mentioned various complaints or reasons for not having this demonstration, I found the following article interesting. Even if you do not agree, I think it explains the position of those at the demonstration quite nicely. As for me, I think you can guess where I stand on the issue.
https://www.minds.com/illumino/blog/in-defense-of-gap-1021901687218294784
Martha Wilson • Sep 19, 2019 at 1:19 pm
I’m sorry–there should have been a question mark at the end of my comment above.
Martha Wilson • Sep 19, 2019 at 1:18 pm
Is it not interesting and worth contemplating, that when faced with concrete evidence of the deaths of defenseless little humans, the young woman quoted was distressed by fears (surely unfounded, I would think) about her own safety.
D. Rose • Sep 18, 2019 at 6:28 pm
If you support abortion as a right, then you ARE pro-abortion. That’s just the truth.
It’s past time we all admitted that we’re talking about ending human lives here. Bottom line, that fetus WILL be a human being…unless someone kills it. Maybe that doesn’t change your calculus — and if not, that’s okay — but we need to be truthful about what this argument is.
Also, regarding the coverage of this demonstration, it’s interesting that progressive groups can do whatever they want, and they’re always cited as brave activists striving for change — and the Evergreeen will even dedicate a summer special feature to the adulation of young women who have had abortions — but when a conservative protest draws any attention at all, it’s controversial and divisive. And this isn’t just the Evergreen, it’s *everybody* in the media.
Whew lad • Sep 17, 2019 at 7:50 pm
holy tits
Faith Martian • Sep 17, 2019 at 3:07 pm
NO ONE IS PRO ABORTION-misleading of the writer to start with this. Women should have control over their own bodies and are PRO-CHOICE. As a mother of 2 daughters attending WSU, it saddens me that they allowed this group such a large demonstration to promote their lies. I wonder what if Planned Parenthood counters this soon with 20 foot pictures of dead women from before Roe, with botched abortions, -what the reaction would be? It’s way past time to defend the rights of women to control their own destiny and bodies.