Letter to the editor: Remove biased story
February 3, 2020
Dear Editor:
We, undersigned community members, believe the article “Musician facing felony charges” published Friday was recklessly biased.
The story’s details come from a single plaintiff and portray Matthew Donald, a black man, as a sadistic offender. Matt says he will plead not guilty because the offenses are imagined.
He will not use this letter to publicly criticize the plaintiff. But, this sensational, unsubstantiated story could follow Matt for life, even if a follow-up article reports his acquittal.
Matt said he’s woken up panicked, reminding himself, “Remember who you are. You’re not guilty just because people saw this story.”
We believe defendants should be innocent until proven guilty, in media and law.
This article’s bias lies not only in its gaping lack of information from the defendant or witnesses, but also in its loaded wording, including repeatedly describing the plaintiff as “the victim.”
The Evergreen contacted Matt’s attorney, who only shared Matt’s plea. This month, two Evergreen reporters contacted Matt about music, yet no reporter contacted him for an article implicating him in felonies.
One quick call with the defender didn’t balance this story, nor justify its distribution.
The regurgitated narrative is months-old, shallowly investigated and involves a single complainant. Is it much more than publicized gossip?
Matt has been an upstanding, contributing community member. He’s faced biased systems since childhood and persevered, earning his GED and attending WSU. He isn’t the monstrous caricature in circulation.
We believe this article should be removed online. The Evergreen should apologize and transparently enact policy to prevent damning community members before their defense in court.
- Gabriella Aragon
- Evelyn Bond
- James Carter
- Matthew Donald
- Kyle Harding
- Adam Hureau
- Alexander Lowe
- Ian Ndambuki
- Yayun Qiao
- Joel Roeber
- Jacqueline Sewell
- Hunter Thompson
- Liuel Tibebe
- Tania Vargas
- Keenan Wright
Diane Matt • Feb 12, 2020 at 10:25 pm
Coincidence? I think not. 2 years ago my son went through the same thing with a false article being published titled, “WSU athlete faces gross misdemeanor charge”. They based their information on a local prosecutor who lied to the judge in court stating that my son had been arrested previously, then recanted her statement saying she “misspoke”. He’s never been arrested. She also claimed he “didn’t show up” for his 1st court appearance, when in fact he was never notified. There were no witnesses and the case was dismissed. Oh, and by the way…this was all over a laptop never removed from the premises and not even damaged. Did I mention my son was also Black?!
We have submitted papers showing the case was dismissed and also requested the article be removed from the Internet to no avail. Irresponsible journalism teaching student writers sensationalism sells even if it ruins lives!
Mike the Mover • Feb 11, 2020 at 4:39 pm
So because he has faced prejuces all of his life (so you say) and is an overall good guy he should be excused from the charges.
If the article facts check out and he was arrested for domestic violence and faces the charges and on bond, then it should stay. Hopefully if the case is resolved in Matthew’s favor, then that fact is published prominently and not buried on the back page somewhere.
Colleen Rhuby • Feb 6, 2020 at 7:27 am
Media puts out what they think “we” want to hear. I want to hear positive, not negative!
Deacon Dianne Lowe • Feb 6, 2020 at 2:25 am
I would hope, though in this case I have not seen it, that reporters would hold forth the first premise of our law: the presumption of innocence.
I think the supervisors of the student staff should have prevented this story from being published unless such a statement was first published.
I am going to attribute this oversight to inexperience; it really is inexcusable on the faculty part. They know better. Y’all faced Murrow a black eye with this story. Maybe if Matt sues you—it will make an impression.